Appellate Update – The Second District Holds that Insurance Company is Not Entitled to Learn Details of Plaintiff’s Settlement Agreement with Co-Defendant Until Its Liability is Established by a Jury
July 14, 2016 by boydjenerette on News
In Allen v. State Farm Fla. Ins. Co., No. 2D15-3114 (Fla. 2d DCA June 10, 2016), Plaintiffs filed suit against State Farm Florida Insurance Company and Federal Insurance Company relating to a sinkhole claim. Plaintiffs subsequently entered into a settlement agreement with Federal Insurance Company. State Farm requested information concerning the settlement and moved to compel the information. The trial court granted State Farm’s request and ordered the Plaintiffs to provide details as to the settlement agreement.
The Plaintiffs filed a writ of certiorari. In response, State Farm argued that disclosure of the settlement agreement is warranted to avoid a double recovery, for purposes of its setoff defense, and to aid it in assessing its settlement options. The Second District granted the Plaintiffs’ petition and quashed the discovery order. The Court reasoned that “it is premature to disclose the settlement when it is not admissible in evidence and would not lead to admissible evidence as to liability.” The Court explained that if State Farm is not found liable, there would be no need to disclose the settlement agreement. State Farm did not establish that the settlement amount with Federal was relevant to defending its liability and the jury’s determination of damages.
If you have any questions about this case or would like to refer an appellate matter, please contact our appellate attorneys.
Kansas R. Gooden
Board Certified Appellate Attorney
Appellate Practice Group Leader
Direct: 904.493.3755
Fax: 904.493.5658
Email: kgooden@boydjen.com
Britney R. Horton
Associate
Direct: 904.309.6789
Fax: 904.493.3752
Email: bhorton@boydjen.com